uQualio Accessibility Evaluation ​

WCAG 2.2 Compliance Audit

Executive Summary

Report Creator: Snehil Kumari Sinha

Evaluation Commissioner: uQualio 

Evaluation date: Thu Jul 24, 2025 

This evaluation assesses the uQualio website’s compliance with WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Out of 55 success criteria, 47 passed, 3 failed, and 5 were not applicable. Overall, the platform demonstrates strong accessibility performance across key areas including keyboard navigation, visual contrast, text alternatives, and form labelling. 

 

However, some issues remain. These include missing input purpose identifiers in form fields, non-descriptive link texts such as “Click to know more,” and a background video on the homepage that cannot be paused. Additionally, certain time-based media elements lack captions or audio descriptions. 

 

Despite these gaps, the platform supports a wide range of assistive technologies and shows a strong foundation for inclusive design. Addressing the highlighted failures will move the platform closer to full WCAG 2.2 AA compliance. 

Scope of the Evaluation

Website name: https://uqualio.com

Scope of the website:  

All public-facing web content of the uQualio platform, located at https://uqualio.com, including homepage, product pages, pricing, blog, and contact forms. 

WCAG Version: 2.2 

Conformance target: AA 

Accessibility support baseline: 

Modern browsers and assistive technologies: – Google Chrome with screen reader (NVDA) – Firefox with screen reader (JAWS) – Safari with VoiceOver on macOS – Keyboard-only navigation on desktop – Mobile screen readers such as TalkBack (Android) and VoiceOver (iOS) 

Additional evaluation requirements 

Not provided 

Detailed Audit Results: Summary

Reported on 55 of 55 WCAG 2.2 AA Success Criteria. 

47 Passed
3 Failed
0 Cannot tell
5 Not present
0 Not checked 

All Results

1. Perceivable

1.1 Text Alternatives

Success Criterion Result Observations
1.1.1: Non-text ContentPassedMost informative images and logos have appropriate alt text. However, some decorative icons and buttons (e.g., on the Pricing and Demo pages) lack clear descriptions or use redundant "image" tags. Needs refinement.

1.2 Time-based Media

Success Criterion Result Observations
1.2.1: Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)Passed
1.2.2: Captions (Prerecorded)PassedSeveral videos (especially in customer testimonials and use case pages) have captions, but not all are closed captions or clearly labeled. Some embedded YouTube videos rely on auto-captions.
1.2.3: Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)Not present
1.2.4: Captions (Live)Not present
1.2.5: Audio Description (Prerecorded) Passed

1.3 Adaptable

Success Criterion Result Observations
1.3.1: Info and Relationships PassedCorrect heading levels and semantic HTML used across most pages. Form labels are present and associated with input fields.
1.3.2: Meaningful Sequence Passed
1.3.3: Sensory Characteristics PassedAll instructional text and form guidance are conveyed using explicit language. No references found that rely solely on color, shape, or spatial orientation.
1.3.4: Orientation PassedAll sample pages support both portrait and landscape display orientations. No restrictions or content lockouts observed during mobile testing using browser emulation and device rotation.
1.3.5: Identify Input Purpose FailedForm input fields (e.g., company name) are missing 'autocomplete' attributes and are not consistently labeled using label or aria-label. Placeholders are used as visual guidance but do not meet accessibility requirements for programmatic input purpose identification.

1.4 Distinguishable

Success Criterion Result Observations
1.4.1: Use of Color PassedAll UI components use text or icons in addition to color to communicate meaning. No reliance on color alone.
1.4.2: Audio Control Not present
1.4.3: Contrast (Minimum) PassedOn the pricing page (https://uqualio.com/pricing) - there are two pricing options available (Business Plans OR Education/ Government Plan), but the currently selected one isn't visible at all.
1.4.4: Resize text PassedText across all sample pages can be resized up to 200% using browser zoom without loss of content or functionality. Layout remains responsive, and no overlapping, clipping, or horizontal scrolling was observed. Verified using Chrome and Firefox zoom tools.
1.4.5: Images of Text Passed
1.4.10: Reflow Passed
1.4.11: Non-text Contrast PassedAll user interface components and graphical objects maintain a contrast ratio of 8.59:1 or higher against their adjacent background. This exceeds the WCAG 2.2 minimum requirement of 3:1. Verified using WAVE Tool.
1.4.12: Text Spacing PassedAll text remains readable and functional when text spacing is overridden using WCAG 2.2 recommended values. Verified by applying CSS overrides for line height, paragraph spacing, letter spacing, and word spacing. No content loss or overlap observed.
1.4.13: Content on Hover or Focus Passed

2. Operable

2.1 Keyboard Accessible

Success Criterion Result Observations
2.1.1: Keyboard PassedAll interactive elements on the homepage are fully operable using only the keyboard.
2.1.2: No Keyboard Trap Passed
2.1.4: Character Key Shortcuts Passed

2.2 Enough Time

Success Criterion Result Observations
2.2.1: Timing Adjustable PassedThe website has no time limits on anything
2.2.2: Pause, Stop, Hide FailedThe first video running on teh background of the Homepage (https://uqualio.com/) cannot be paused

2.3 Seizures and Physical Reactions

Success Criterion Result Observations
2.3.1: Three Flashes or Below Threshold Passed

2.4 Navigable

Success Criterion Result Observations
2.4.1: Bypass Blocks Passed
2.4.2: Page Titled Passed
2.4.3: Focus Order Passed
2.4.4: Link Purpose (In Context) FailedOn the product features page, screen reader users may hear - “Link, Click to know more”, but won’t know what it’s about out of context. The text in the buttons should be more decriptive like, "Learn more about employee training" etc.
2.4.5: Multiple Ways Passed
2.4.6: Headings and Labels Passed
2.4.7: Focus Visible Passed
2.4.11: Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) Passed

2.5 Input Modalities

Success Criterion Result Observations
2.5.1: Pointer Gestures PassedNo functionality on the page relies on multipoint or path-based gestures. All interactions are accessible via single-pointer input (e.g., click/tap).
2.5.2: Pointer Cancellation Passed
2.5.3: Label in Name Passed
2.5.4: Motion Actuation Passed
2.5.7: Dragging Movements Passed
2.5.8: Target Size (Minimum) Passed

3. Understandable

3.1 Readable

Success Criterion Result Observations
3.1.1: Language of Page Passed
3.1.2: Language of Parts Not present

3.2 Predictable

Success Criterion Result Observations
3.2.1: On Focus Passed
3.2.2: On Input Passed
3.2.3: Consistent Navigation Passed
3.2.4: Consistent Identification Passed
3.2.6: Consistent Help Passed

3.3 Input Assistance

Success Criterion Result Observations
3.3.1: Error Identification Passed
3.3.2: Labels or Instructions Passed
3.3.3: Error Suggestion Passed
3.3.4: Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data) Not present The pricing page has no direct payment or critical data editing
3.3.7: Redundant Entry Passed
3.3.8: Accessible Authentication (Minimum) Passed

4. Robust

4.1 Compatible

Success Criterion Result Observations
4.1.2: Name, Role, Value Passed
4.1.3: Status Messages Passed

Web Technology

  • HTML
  • CSS
  • JavaScript

     

Recording of Evaluation Specifics: Not provided